Comments on: Beta Testers: Ghostcrawler Needs You!

By: Farseer Lolotea

Farseer Lolotea — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:32:16 +0000

I’d test if they’d only send me a key already. (And if my SO cuts out the denial about us needing a new computer.)

By: Kristy

Kristy — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:26:59 +0000

Whatever Rika. It applies to HIM too. Don’t frigging take sides here. You didn’t say anything to that stupid guy and you should’ve too. That’s wrong.

By: Mania’s Arcania » Feedback on Pet Skills + Incoming Talent Changes

Mania’s Arcania » Feedback on Pet Skills + Incoming Talent Changes — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:36:30 +0000

[...] edited this into the previous post on the topic, but this news really deserves its own [...]

By: Rikaku

Rikaku — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:08:36 +0000

Mania has already stated before to be polite on the forums. If you were wronged, doesn’t mean to wrong someone else. If you don’t agree with someone, that’s fine, but let’s not clutter up the comment page with angry comments at each other.

By: Kristy

Kristy — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 06:19:26 +0000

Xanar: It’s not “funny”. I didn’t say or call you anything. Don’t be a jerk. And no, so-called “everyone” don’t wanna call me a “noob”. Nor do they wanna “tell me to stop complaining”, jerk.

By: Nachtwulf

Nachtwulf — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 05:02:29 +0000

Heh. I love how people are all ‘QQ cats has no speshul dps skill they lose dps onoez they suk now’ and so Bliz goes ‘Hey, cats get another damage skill!’ and now you hear ‘QQ cats haz too much dps unfair! unfair!’ … Guess you really can’t make everyone happy.

Still, I’m VERY grateful for the speed of changes and the willingness Bliz is showing to respond to valid arguments. I think rather than a glyph though, an alchemical elixir of ‘Shrink Pet’ would be great (not that I’m an alchemist or anything *cough*) but a consumable would make rather more sense than burning a glyph slot on it. Sort of like anti-petbiscuits?

BTW, anyone that says ‘u clik u nub u no raid’ needs to back off. Because I’m a devout clicktargeter, and I raid all the time with no problem. Sometimes I use tab to cycle targets, but generally… *shrug* The four raid guilds that habitually ask me along on their raids can’t all be in error, IMO. (BTW… my raven does fine in Kara! Woot, carrion birds.)

By: Rikaku

Rikaku — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:40:59 +0000

I’m with Xanar, yes, I like the idea of being able to change *MY* pets size. And let’s face it, we’ve all been annoyed by that one guy with a bat in a tight hallway at one point. it doesn’t matter what your raid experience is, we’ve been there before lol. However, imagine that with the corehounds or rhinos. They are quite large. Don’t get me wrong, I love large pets, but having something optional control the size of *my* pet would be nice.

Now, I DONT want it to be a glyph though. A spell would be perfect. Sure, I like my big rhino outside, but when I want to go somewhere and have him offtank (let’s say), I’d like it manageable.

Perhaps what they can do is change pet size in instances? Say that if you zone in, all pets revert to a certain hieght level, like they receive a buff that shrinks them when you’re in an instance. Then when you step out, bam normal sized pet.

By: Mania

Mania — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:24:41 +0000

I believe she means that all pets will now have something like 10% more base armor, and that all three trees will have a +0% armor mod. (I’m guessing on the percentage. Well, I’m guessing on all of it. But that’s how I interpreted it.)

By: Teika

Teika — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:12:50 +0000

“Tenacity and Ferocity pets lost their armor multiplier but it was given to all pets at base. The net effect is that Cunning pets won’t be at a stat deficit compared to the other trees.”

I dont quite understand….might be me being tired 04:12 in the morning over here…but I dont understand what she means xD

By: Kristy

Kristy — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:02:13 +0000

Xanar: Who are you talking to? You can’t be rude here.