<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PTR 2.4.2: New PTR Build</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maniasarcania.com/2008/05/02/ptr-242-new-ptr-build/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maniasarcania.com/2008/05/02/ptr-242-new-ptr-build/</link>
	<description>Hunter pets in the World of Warcraft.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: For the Pie</title>
		<link>http://www.maniasarcania.com/2008/05/02/ptr-242-new-ptr-build/#comment-19771</link>
		<dc:creator>For the Pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maniasarcania.com/?p=588#comment-19771</guid>
		<description>Well the upside to pets not holding aggro as well, you save mana by just auto shooting while farming/grinding/questing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the upside to pets not holding aggro as well, you save mana by just auto shooting while farming/grinding/questing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palladiamors</title>
		<link>http://www.maniasarcania.com/2008/05/02/ptr-242-new-ptr-build/#comment-19641</link>
		<dc:creator>Palladiamors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maniasarcania.com/?p=588#comment-19641</guid>
		<description>*Chuckles*  Was that sarcasm, Znodis?

Eh, this isn't the first time they have had problems fixing things like that.  If you'll remember, pet scaling was a major patch back when TBC came out.  They are trying to do one part of pet scaling, but trying to do it in a much smaller time frame, and if I had to wager, I'd say they are fumbling.  

Eric, it wouldn't be a buff for most hunters at seventy, it'd be a straight out nerf.  But, on the bright side, that nerf would last right up until Wrath came out, and then turn into a buff.  Eh, if they do ever find a way to fix it, then I suppose I can live with it for a few months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Chuckles*  Was that sarcasm, Znodis?</p>
<p>Eh, this isn&#8217;t the first time they have had problems fixing things like that.  If you&#8217;ll remember, pet scaling was a major patch back when TBC came out.  They are trying to do one part of pet scaling, but trying to do it in a much smaller time frame, and if I had to wager, I&#8217;d say they are fumbling.  </p>
<p>Eric, it wouldn&#8217;t be a buff for most hunters at seventy, it&#8217;d be a straight out nerf.  But, on the bright side, that nerf would last right up until Wrath came out, and then turn into a buff.  Eh, if they do ever find a way to fix it, then I suppose I can live with it for a few months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Znodis</title>
		<link>http://www.maniasarcania.com/2008/05/02/ptr-242-new-ptr-build/#comment-19637</link>
		<dc:creator>Znodis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maniasarcania.com/?p=588#comment-19637</guid>
		<description>Good thing Bliz is open to discussion and evaluation of this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing Bliz is open to discussion and evaluation of this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seidouyumi</title>
		<link>http://www.maniasarcania.com/2008/05/02/ptr-242-new-ptr-build/#comment-19636</link>
		<dc:creator>Seidouyumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maniasarcania.com/?p=588#comment-19636</guid>
		<description>Eric, supposedly the contribution from the RAP is suppose to start at 1600 RAP.  However, just doing it as a flat rate off the Spell Bonus would work a lot better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, supposedly the contribution from the RAP is suppose to start at 1600 RAP.  However, just doing it as a flat rate off the Spell Bonus would work a lot better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.maniasarcania.com/2008/05/02/ptr-242-new-ptr-build/#comment-19634</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maniasarcania.com/?p=588#comment-19634</guid>
		<description>If they do truly make it scale off Hunter AP instead of Pet, this will be a huge buff. Assuming of course that they don't change the equation used to determine Growl's threat. I have 2100 AP unbuffed, that would make growl do more threat than the old boar with charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they do truly make it scale off Hunter AP instead of Pet, this will be a huge buff. Assuming of course that they don&#8217;t change the equation used to determine Growl&#8217;s threat. I have 2100 AP unbuffed, that would make growl do more threat than the old boar with charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seidouyumi</title>
		<link>http://www.maniasarcania.com/2008/05/02/ptr-242-new-ptr-build/#comment-19633</link>
		<dc:creator>Seidouyumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maniasarcania.com/?p=588#comment-19633</guid>
		<description>Ever begin to wonder if it's a typo and they meant to switch that around?  Growl will now stack with Pet Attack Power instead of Hunter's Ranged Attack Power?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever begin to wonder if it&#8217;s a typo and they meant to switch that around?  Growl will now stack with Pet Attack Power instead of Hunter&#8217;s Ranged Attack Power?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
